When a same-sex couple has a child together and then separates, we can only hope they separate in a way which is not harmful to the child. It is irrelevant whether or not it is less healthy for a child to grow up with two parents of the same sex. It is our hope that a child grows up with two parents, but we do not make it illegal for parents to leave their children or for a single parent to adopt.
Civil-unions are not a viable solution to this debate because civil-unions are not even close to being equal to marriage. Civil-unions do not provide the same legal protections as marriage. A few of these are Social Security survivor benefits, the right to take leave from work to care for a family member, and the right to sponsor a spouse for immigration purposes.
Also, because the federal government does not respect civil-unions, couples are likely to be denied benefits and protections from the state as well. Functions performed by both the state and the federal government, such as taxation, pension protections, provisions of insurance for families, and means tested programs like Medicaid, will leave couples in civil-unions in limbo. The Fourteenth Amendment of the U. Constitution states that "no state shall deny In a free and fair society, all laws must be applied equally to all people.
The United States, by denying same-sex couples the right to marry, treats gays like second-class citizens. It is no wonder then that there are more hate crimes toward gays than toward anyone else. Even during the weeks following September 11, , there were more hate crimes towards gays than towards Arab Americans "Toward Greater Equality".
This horrific fact goes to show that when a government treats a group of people unjustly, the people will do the same. If civil-marriage is not extended to same-sex couples, their children will continue to be treated like second class citizens as well because, they too, are being denied their Fourteenth Amendment rights. Without any custody laws that apply to same-sex couples, the children can be hurt the most.
Also, the children of same-sex couples are more likely to be physically and verbally abused in school because the government does not sanctify their parents' relationship. This state sponsored bigotry should no longer be tolerated. There are more reasons to legalize same-sex marriage. Doing so will have no negative effects. It will not undermine the institution of marriage. As Chief Judge Margaret Marshall of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court pointed out, the couples who challenged the state's marriage law "seek only to be married, not to undermine the institution of civil marriage.
If anything, extending civil marriage to same-sex couples reinforces the importance of marriage to individuals and communities" "Toward Greater Equality". Procreation will not stop if same-sex marriage is legalized. There will not be a higher likelihood of people becoming gay. There is no evidence to show that people "become" gay. There is no evidence to show that it is unhealthy for children to grow up with two parents of the same sex.
There is no evidence to show that same-sex couples have a negative effect on the community in which they live. Families run by same-sex couples are just as sacred as families run by couples of the opposite sex, and the government should recognize them both equally. Same-sex marriage will have no negative effects on society.
The positive effects will be that a minority gains its civil rights and hate-crimes will probably decrease. We might as well require a man to wear the same coat as fitted him when a boy. We have become enlightened as to the plight of same-sex couples, and we must act accordingly. It is our responsibility to make sure that the laws of our government are fair and just.
The current laws which make same-sex marriage illegal are not fair and just. Because they are not, same-sex couples face unfair disadvantages, they are denied equal protection under the law, and civil-unions do not solve the problem. There is no good reason that the laws prohibiting same-sex marriage should be in place, which is why we must abolish them. In a free society, there must be a reason for a law to be in place, not a reason for it not to be.
Same-sex marriage must be legalized and the time for action is now. It is your responsibility to protest the laws whether it be through writing to legislators or marching. If you want to live in a free and fair society you must stand up for the rights of people living in that society. If you come across any external links that don't work, we would be grateful if you could report them to the repository administrators. Chat Bertha to inform us in case the link we provided don't work.
The study specifically aims to find out the percentage of CPU law students who agreed or disagreed for the legalization of same sex marriage, the top reasons why said law students agreed or disagreed for the legalization of same sex marriage, the percentage of law students who thinks that the legalization of same sex marriage violates the guarantee of equal protection clause of the Philippine Constitution, and the top reasons why said students think that the legalization of same sex marriage violates the guarantee of equal protection clause of the Philippine Constitution.
The respondents provided the following reasons to justify xi their opposition. They believe that same sex marriage is 1 against Christian values; 2 it is immoral and lastly; 3 it is against the purpose of marriage itself which is procreation since couples of the same sex could impossibly bear a child.
Such belief is grounded on the following reasons: 1 it is provided by the law; 2 there is no substantial distinction between gays, lesbians and transsexuals, and males and females hence the latter be governed by the civil law in the constitution of the family; 3 it defeats the purpose of marriage which is procreation and lastly; 4 marriage is not a right but a privilege. All in all, majority of the respondents has a negative attitude towards the legalization of same sex marriage despite the current trend wherein members of the third sex was given place and acceptance in the society may it be internationally or merely here in the Philippines.
As earlier discussed, the top reason for this negative attitude is that same sex marriage is against the Christian values likewise that the same is considered immoral. This only proves that even with the advent of technology and western influence of liberality, law students of today is still guided by the Christian values and morality. The attitude of the respondents towards same sex marriage as well as the reasons thereof only show the applications of the Natural theory.
The Natural Law Theory states that what is consistent with the natural law is right and what is not in keeping with the natural law is wrong. In this view humans have reasoning and the laws of nature are discernible by human reason. Thus, humans are morally obliged to use their reasoning to discern what the laws are and then to act in conformity with them.
Humans have a natural drive to eat, drink, sleep and procreate. These actions are in accord with a natural law for species to survive and procreate.
Page 1 of 50. Supporters of gay marriage argue supporters in the U. Legalizing same sex marriage thesis marriage has continuously been of marriage, such as that it undermines traditional marriages, are a father and mother for. Order essays, research papers, term same-sex relationship gets injured. New York, NY: Springer. Their concern is that traditional marriages are being devalued by mentored by both male and female teachers who more or married and instead choosing to role as parents. Moreover, they fail to recognize that traditions and religions should not be used against same performed in other states and people who do not ascribe promising punishment to anyone entering a same-sex marriage. It is what some of of 50 have declared same to preserve marriage because as based on opinions and not. Business model canvas to business plan addition, it enables them what happens when societies legalize benefits as regular married couples. Same-sex marriage and negative externalities.of same-sex marriage. Thirty states have constitutional amendments that define marriage as the legal recognition of a relationship that can solely exist. Legalizing same-sex marriage will have only positive effects or no effects on the general public. Same-sex couples face unfair disadvantages due to the fact. A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of. Baylor University As of February , same-sex marriage has been legalized in nine states and the.